This HTML5 document contains 22 embedded RDF statements represented using HTML+Microdata notation.

The embedded RDF content will be recognized by any processor of HTML5 Microdata.

Subject Item

n16:Retrieve_via_URL

owl:sameAs

dbpedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

Subject Item

n19:Retrieve_via_URL

dbo:wikiPageRedirects

dbpedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

Subject Item

wikipedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

foaf:primaryTopic

dbpedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

Subject Item

dbpedia-es:Retrieve_via_URL

dbo:wikiPageRedirects

dbpedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

Subject Item

dbpedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

rdfs:label

Recuperación mediante URL

rdfs:comment

La búsqueda y recuperación mediante URL (Search/Retrieve via URL, SRU) es un protocolo estándar de búsqueda y recuperación de consultas que utiliza el lenguaje de consulta contextual (Contextual Query Language, CQL), una sintaxis de consulta estándar para representar consultas. Código XML de muestra de una completa respuesta para la consulta mediante la siguiente consulta SRU con consulta de URL version=1.1&operation=searchRetrieve&query=dc.title=Darwinism y consulta de CQL consulta dc.title=Darwinism:

dct:subject

category-es:Búsqueda_en_internet category-es:Localizador_de_recursos_uniforme

foaf:isPrimaryTopicOf

wikipedia-es:Recuperación_mediante_URL

dbo:wikiPageID

8558835

dbo:wikiPageRevisionID

125249046

dbo:wikiPageExternalLink

n4: n5: n8: n9:html n10:php n18: n20: n21:Darwinism

dbo:wikiPageLength

5081

prov:wasDerivedFrom

n12:0

dbo:abstract

La búsqueda y recuperación mediante URL (Search/Retrieve via URL, SRU) es un protocolo estándar de búsqueda y recuperación de consultas que utiliza el lenguaje de consulta contextual (Contextual Query Language, CQL), una sintaxis de consulta estándar para representar consultas. Código XML de muestra de una completa respuesta para la consulta mediante la siguiente consulta SRU con consulta de URL version=1.1&operation=searchRetrieve&query=dc.title=Darwinism y consulta de CQL consulta dc.title=Darwinism: <?xml version="1.0"?><sru:searchRetrieveResponse xmlns:sru="https://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/" xmlns:diag="https://www.loc.gov/zing/srw/diagnostic/" xmlns:xcql="https://www.loc.gov/zing/cql/xcql/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"> <sru:version>1.1</sru:version> <sru:numberOfRecords>4</sru:numberOfRecords> <sru:records> <sru:record> <sru:recordSchema>info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1</sru:recordSchema> <sru:recordPacking>XML</sru:recordPacking> <sru:recordData> <sru:dc> <sru:title>Darwinism</sru:title> <sru:creator>Dennett</sru:creator> <sru:subject>The rule of the Local is a basic principle of Darwinism - it corresponds to the principle that there is no Creator, no intelligent foresight. I 262</sru:subject> </sru:dc> </sru:recordData> <sru:recordNumber>1</sru:recordNumber> </sru:record> <sru:record> <sru:recordSchema>info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1</sru:recordSchema> <sru:recordPacking>XML</sru:recordPacking> <sru:recordData> <sru:dc> <sru:title>Darwinism</sru:title> <sru:creator>McGinn</sru:creator> <sru:subject>Design argument/William Paley: organisms have a brilliant design: We have not designed them, so we have to assume that a foreign intelligence did it. Let s call this intelligence "God". So God exists. II 98DarwinVsPaley: intelligent design does not require a Creator. Selection is sufficient. II 98Mind/consciousness/evolution/McGinn: evolution does not explain consciousness! nor sensations. II 99 Reason: sensation and consciousness cannot be explained through the means of Darwinian principles and physics, because if selection were to explain how sensations are supposed to be created by it, it must be possible to mold the mind from matter. II 100 (s) Consciousness or sensations would have to be visible for selection! (Similar GouldVsDawkins)</sru:subject> </sru:dc> </sru:recordData> <sru:recordNumber>2</sru:recordNumber> </sru:record> <sru:record> <sru:recordSchema>info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1</sru:recordSchema> <sru:recordPacking>XML</sru:recordPacking> <sru:recordData> <sru:dc> <sru:title>Darwinism</sru:title> <sru:creator>Putnam</sru:creator> <sru:subject>Rorty: Darwinism / Putnam: he does noit like the image of man as a more complicated animal (scientistic and reductionist physicalism).Rorty VI 63</sru:subject> </sru:dc> </sru:recordData> <sru:recordNumber>3</sru:recordNumber> </sru:record> <sru:record> <sru:recordSchema>info:srw/schema/1/dc-v1.1</sru:recordSchema> <sru:recordPacking>XML</sru:recordPacking> <sru:recordData> <sru:dc> <sru:title>Darwinism</sru:title> <sru:creator>Rorty</sru:creator> <sru:subject>Darwinism/Rorty provides a useful vocabulary. "Darwinism": for me is a fable about human beings as animals with special skills and organs. But these organs and skills are just as little in a representational relation to the world as the anteater s snout. VI 69 ffDarwinism/Rorty: it demands that we consider our doing and being as part of the same continuum, which also includes the existence of amoebae, spiders and squirrels. One way to do that is to say that our experience is just more complex. VI 424</sru:subject> </sru:dc> </sru:recordData> <sru:recordNumber>4</sru:recordNumber> </sru:record> </sru:records></sru:searchRetrieveResponse>